Ticket #9313 (closed PLIP: wontfix)
Mobile View with Mobile Image selection options
Reported by: | pigeonflight | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 4.0 |
Component: | Unknown | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | plip-advisories@… |
Description
Proposer: David "pigeonflight" Bain
Seconder: None as yet
Motivation
Plone needs a mobile view that provides a sensible default for mobile devices. There are many mobile devices that don't respect standard mobile stylesheets, the best approach is to provide a mobile version of pages.
Assumptions
Key assumptions made. What is being covered by and what is intentionally left out of the scope of the proposal.
Proposal & Implementation
The mobile system should allow a content manager to specify a mobile version of images found in the page. A content manager should be able to select an image and provide the mobile alternative. They should also be able to preview the mobile version.
Deliverables
Required code:
- a mobile view (@@mobile) which adapts the normal plone view
- a mobile edit view (@@mobile_edit) which makes it possible to customize the mobile version, including the images.
- Unit tests
- Localization
- Documentation
Risks
I don't know enough to be sure of the risks, hopefully someone else can add notes here.
Participants
?
Progress
I know of the Mobilize Product from Weblion, I'm not sure how similar that is see: https://weblion.psu.edu/trac/weblion/wiki/MobilizeProduct
Change History
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by erikrose
Clearing Owner field of 4.0 PLIPs so we can use it to mean "implementor". (Many of these owners were automatically assigned from choosing a Component that had a default owner.)
comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by alecm
This PLIP would, IMO, need significantly more detail to be considered for Plone 4.0. Providing a mobile skin out of the box could be very useful, but it doesn't appear that this PLIP provides a realistic outline of that feature. The lack of participants is also not encouraging.
comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by MatthewWilkes
This PLIP is incomplete, and what I can see of the implementation appears to be a Bad Way of doing things, i.e. using named views rather than layers.
FWT Vote: -1
comment:7 Changed 7 years ago by davisagli
FWT vote: -1. I am +1 on the general concept of a mobile view, but I think a successful PLIP needs more detail including a consideration of which mobile devices actually should see a special view and how that determination is made during traversal; as well as a consideration of different options for registering mobile views and why a particular one was chosen.
I think an improved version of this PLIP could probably be submitted for a later release in the 4.x series.
comment:8 Changed 7 years ago by raphael
FWT vote: -1
I see this as a feature request more than anything else
comment:10 Changed 7 years ago by esteele
- Status changed from new to closed
- Resolution set to wontfix
Rejected for Plone 4.0 by FWT vote.
comment:11 Changed 7 years ago by miohtama
No need to add this to core. This is "fixed" by add on product: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/gomobile.mobile
Your participants section is just "?" at the moment, does this mean you're unwilling to be a participant?